In 2012,
Long Island was hit hard by Hurricane Sandy. Now, three years later, New York
is still feeling the economic effects of the superstorm. Meghan McPherson,
assistant director of the Center for Health Innovation and adjunct faculty
member for the Emergency Management Graduate Programs, was featured in Newsday this week and covered how the
storm is still affecting us today.
New York State needs $17.8B more in
Sandy aid
Officials
said those costs from the 2011 and 2012 storms are expected to rise as the
state continues to evaluate recovery and mitigation needs, with infrastructure
projects such as sewer systems, rail lines, park amenities and wastewater
facilities accounting for most of the costs.
The
projections -- which do not include New York City -- are detailed in a funding
plan amendment the Governor's Office of Storm Recovery filed with U.S. Housing
and Urban Development updating how the state has spent or plans to spend the
about $4.4 billion in federal disaster recovery grants that Congress
appropriated in January 2013. HUD approved the plan in April 2015.
"The
damage is much larger than the allocation we received," said Simon
McDonnell, director of Research and Strategic Analysis for the Governor's
Office of Storm Recovery.
What's
more, there is likely no more federal funding coming down the road, given that
Congress authorized $60 billion in recovery dollars after Sandy. About $17
billion was allocated to New York through several federal agencies including
HUD, Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers.
"There's
not going to be any changes in the allocation," HUD spokesman Brian
Sullivan said. "What New York got, New York got."
He
later added, "Even with the substantial federal investment . . . we
recognize there may be lingering, unmet needs. For its part, HUD allocated all
the recovery funds Congress appropriated for this purpose."
States
are asked to tell the federal government of their needs -- even though there
may be no additional funding -- because existing money can be refocused as
circumstances change.
New
York says it filed the projection to keep a tally of need in case other sources
of funding may happen. "It's not an inflated number," storm recovery
spokeswoman Barbara Brancaccio said. "It's just everything is included
there. You have to be strategic. You're constantly playing a matchmaking game
between [funding] source and project."
Disaster
recovery money never truly fulfills the need, Sullivan said. "I haven't
heard of a single disaster when the need hasn't exceeded the funds allocated
for disaster recovery," he added.
That
need can be acute when it comes to costly infrastructure projects that are long
term and highly expensive but not necessarily considered a funding priority,
said Andy Herrmann, past president of the American Society of Civil Engineers.
Public
spending on transportation and water infrastructure dropped 23 percent between
2003 and 2014, according to a March report issued by the Congressional Budget
Office.
Costly
delays
"We're
not spending enough money on our roads and bridges and when they get hit with
something like superstorm Sandy it takes a long time to recover," Herrmann
said. "By not investing, it is going to cost us more money in the long
run."
In
its 2015 infrastructure report card for New York, the society rated the state
with a C- after examining bridges, dams, roads, transit, wastewater and
drinking water and other systems. The report card said it would cost New York
$36.2 billion to repair, replace or update wastewater infrastructures over 20
years, and another $40 billion would have to be spent on roadways by 2030 to
keep up with road conditions.
Those
findings mean the state's infrastructure needs since the disaster are not
surprising, Herrmann said.
On
a national level, the need is more severe. In a 2013 nationwide report card,
the society gave the United States a D+ and said $3.6 trillion would be needed
by 2020 for projects ranging from aviation to wastewater.
"It's
no secret that New York -- and the entire country -- is sorely lacking the
infrastructure funds needed to repair our crumbling roads, bridges and
water-sewer systems," Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said in a statement.
"In addition to an increase in federal grant dollars, one effective way to
tackle the laundry list of projects is to establish a federal 'infrastructure
bank' that states can access to put people to work building what they
need."
Efforts
to create such a bank have repeatedly failed.
In
its filings to HUD, New Jersey said it needs another $29.6 billion to
completely recover from the three storms.
New
York City estimated it had $17 billion in unmet needs after its initial aid
application but has not updated that number to HUD since it initially filed
after Sandy. City officials said they never expected to recoup the full $17
billion in damages.
Instead,
in 2013 the city issued a 10-year $20 billion recovery and resiliency plan that
outlined 257 initiatives throughout the boroughs to harden the city and upgrade
infrastructure.
Mayor
Bill de Blasio's spokeswoman Amy Spitalnick said that more than $20 billion has
been secured "but we continue to seek new funds to address additional
long-term climate adaptation needs."
The money is coming from a number of
sources, including Con Edison, the city, New York Rising and federal agencies
such as FEMA, HUD and Army Corps of Engineers, she said.
The city is still seeking money --
public and private -- for remaining projects that need funding, such as
retrofitting private buildings for resiliency. Both the city and the state have
applied for additional money as part of a national resilience competition. The
winners, expected to be announced in January, will receive awards between $1
million and $500 million, according to HUD.
Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo's office did
not respond to requests for comment about whether the state has pushed for more
money elsewhere or cobbled together funding from other sources.
"Essentially there is no source
of funding for these additional unmet needs," McDonnell of the governor's
office said.
Aides with Assemb. Robert Rodriguez
(D-Manhattan), who chairs the subcommittee on infrastructure, and state Sen.
Andrew Lanza (R-Staten Island), who chairs the committee on infrastructure and
capital investment, did not respond to requests for comment.
"There are substantial
needs," said state Sen. Thomas Croci (R-Sayville), who serves on the
infrastructure and capital investment committee. "Part of the issue has
been not a sustained level of commitment in investing in infrastructure. You
have to invest infrastructure money in places with the highest maximum benefit.
These are not endless funds."
The projects that the state counts
in its unfunded need tally include $546 million for an outflow pipe at the Bay
Park sewage treatment plant in East Rockaway and $52.4 million for a project
called Living with the Bay, focusing on an area stretching from Hempstead Lake
Park to East Rockaway.
"The number of infrastructure
projects will continually increase as more physical needs assessments are
completed," the amendment said.
To help communities rebuild, the
state formed community reconstruction groups in 124 communities stretching from
Long Island to Niagara County and allocated $700 million for projects proposed
by these grassroots groups. Dozens have been approved. But an estimated 275
projects -- from microgrids and storm water retention to community assistance
centers and solar panels at schools -- are unfunded and total an estimated $1.6
billion. They are included in the state's tally of unmet needs.
Unfunded economic development costs
total $898 million. Housing costs without sources of funding are more than $2.9
billion.
A local connection
Most federal aid programs require
some local entity to provide money to cover a portion of the costs. It's called
a local match and the state has pledged more than $580 million to help
municipalities cover that requirement. The stateincludes that in the unmet need
tally.
"These are projects that still
remain unconstructed and they won't go ahead until we pay the local
match," McDonnell said.
Some say that's not necessarily an
unmet need.
"Your cost share is not an
unmet need," said Meghan McPherson, an adjunct faculty member for Adelphi
University's emergency management graduate program. "Repairing the bridge
is an unmet need. The local match is a barrier for the project but not an unmet
need to the feds. Your need is to fix the bridge."
"You're never going to be made
whole by disaster recovery funds," said McPherson, who is also assistant
director of Adelphi's Center for Health Innovation. "That's an unfortunate
expectation in disaster recovery. You're not going to have one to one. You
can't expect the feds to account for every dollar."
State officials say they are simply
being judicious.
"For now it's a list to stay
out there," McDonnell said. "We constantly change our budget and priorities."
Also, while HUD provides guidance on
calculating unmet need, there are no specific statutory requirements.
"There is no standard,"
said Laurel Matula, a program manager for ER Assist in Bentonville, Arkansas,
which does disaster recovery consulting. "The difference of what a need is
varies from area to area, state to state, disaster to disaster.
"The real questions is, 'Is
there pork in there . . . or pet projects in there,' " she added.
"The answer is 'Of course there is.' "